By SABC Sport
11th September 2023
Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend was among those left frustrated after Jesse Kriel was not punished for a dangerous tackle during South Africa's Rugby World Cup opener.
The Springbok centre clashed heads with Scotland back-rower Jack Dempsey in the opening minutes of the match, but the incident was missed by the officials.
Much like Tom Curry's sending off at the same ground on Saturday, Kriel made the tackle in the opening minutes as he rushed up to hit Dempsey.
It also came shortly after Chile captain Martin Sigren was shown a yellow card for a head clash with Japan's Kotaro Matsushima.
However, while the other two incidents saw cards issued, Scotland did not even get a penalty for the challenge despite the players pleading with referee Angus Gardner.
What might have counted in Kriel's favour is that while the two players did make head contact, neither player was left injured, suggesting the contact was minimal.
Nevertheless, the incident left non-Springbok supporters angry.
Youd think the RFU would challenge the Tom Curry red card at Tuesdays hearing.
— Alex Lowe ? (@AlexMLowe) September 10, 2023
Could this Jesse Kriel decision - and the Martin Sigren decision earlier which is more similar - help their case? Plus youd expect them to argue for mitigation given the dynamics of the situation. pic.twitter.com/jB4bI4Mwbm
"The confusion is that the TMOs are always looking," said former Scotland international John Barclay.
"You are two minutes into a game, and you've got an incident that, as you see, is a red card. It is a red card.
"He comes from a distance, a clear line of sight, no drop in height, and he applies force. It's head-on-head. That's a red card.
"That's the way the game is refereed - whether you like or it not - that is a red card.
"We saw a very similar incident last night [Tom Curry's sending off] that was given as a yellow and was upgraded to a red in the bunker.
"This is where the game gets a bit messy because this is where they look very similar. Yeah, from slightly different positions from a kick, but that is a red card, and the fact it wasn't seen or reviewed is inexcusable."
The reaction on social media platform X was largely in line with Barclay.
Nick Johnston's post read: “Barclay is absolutely right, and has clearly read the stuff on World Rugby's website – may not agree with the laws, but under them, Kriel should have got a red card for that challenge. The inconsistency in officiating does the game no favours."
Meanwhile, English journalist Alex Lowe felt that England might use Kriel's tackle during Curry's hearing on Tuesday evening.
"You'd think the RFU would challenge the Tom Curry red card at Tuesday's hearing. Could this Jesse Kriel decision - and the Martin Sigren decision earlier, which is more similar - help their case? Plus you'd expect them to argue for mitigation given the dynamics of the situation," his post read.